הכשרת מורים להוראה מקוונת

[3] Achinstein, B., & Athanases, S. Z. (2005). Focusing new teachers on diversity and equity: Toward a knowledge base for mentors. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21 (7), 843–862.

[4] Bandura, A. (1986). The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4, 359-373. doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1521/jscp.1986.4.3.359

[5] Benton-Borghi, B. H. (2013). A Universally Designed for Learning (UDL) infused Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) practitioners' model essential for teacher preparation in the 21st Century. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 48 (2), 245-265.

[6] Berliner, D. C. (2001) Learning about and learning from expert teachers, International Journal of Educational Research, 35 (5), 463–482.

[7] Blonder, R. & Rap, S. (2017). I like Facebook: Exploring Israeli high school chemistry teachers' TPACK and self-efficacy beliefs, Education and Information Technologies, 22 (2), 697–724. doi:10.1007/s10639-015-9384-6

[8] Blonder, R., & Waldman, R. (2019). The role of a WhatsApp group of a professional learning community of chemistry teachers in the development of their knowledge. In A. Forkosh-Baruch, & H. Meishar-Tal (Eds.) Mobile technologies for educational organizations. (pp. 117-140). IGI Global. doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-8106-2.ch007

[9] Blonder, R., Jonatan, M., Bar-Dov, Z., Benny, N., Rap, S., & Sakhnini, S. (2013). Can You Tube it? Providing chemistry teachers with technological tools and enhancing their efficacy beliefs. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice, 14, 269-285. doi:10.1039/c3rp00001j

[10] Bungum, B. (2006). Transferring an transforming technology education: A study of Norwegian teachers’ perceptions of ideas from design and technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 16, 31–52.

[11] Capraro, R. M. & Slough, S. W. (2013). Why PBL? Why STEM? Why now? An introduction to project-based learning: An integrated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) approach. In R. M. Capraro & S. W. Slough (Eds.), Project based learning: An integrated science technology engineering and mathematics (STEM) approach(pp. 1–6). Rotterdam: Sense.

[12] CAST. (2011). Universal design for learning guidelines (version 2.0). Wakefield, MA: Author. Retrieved June 14, 2020 

[13] Chikasanda, V. K. M., Otrel-Cass, K., Williams, J., & Jones, A. (2013). Enhancing teachers’ technological pedagogical knowledge and practices: A professional development model for technology teachers in Malawi. InternationalJournal of Technology & Design Education, 23, 597–622.

[14] Clarke, A., Triggs, V., & Nielsen, W. (2014). Cooperating teacher participation in teacher education: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 84 (2), 163–202

[15] Cleveland-Innes, M., & Campbell, P. (2012). Emotional presence, learning, and the online learning environment. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13 (4), 269-292

[16] Compton, V., & Jones, A. (1998). Reflecting on teacher development in technology education: Implications for future programmes. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 8(2), 151–166. doi:10.1023/A:1008808327436.

[17] Deng, F., Chai, C. S., Tsai, C. C., & Lee, M. H. (2014). The relationships among Chinese practicing teachers’ epistemic beliefs, pedagogical beliefs and their beliefs about the use of ICT. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(2), 245–256.

[18] Dorfman, B.-S., Terrill, B., Patterson, K., Yarden, A., Blonder, R. (2019). Teachers personalize videos and animations of biochemical processes: Results from a professional development workshop. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 20 (4), 772-786. doi:10.1039/C9RP00057G

[19] Dovbenko, S. (2020). Problem of resistance to the introduction of distance learning models of training in the vocational training of educators. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(2), 1-12.

[20] Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001a). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers College Record, 103 (6), 1013–1055.

[21] Fellus, O., & Biton, Y. (2017). One is not born a mathematician: In conversation with Vasily Davydov. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 18 (2), 136−160.

[22] Fullan, M. and K. Donnelly (2013) Alive in the swamp: Assessing digital innovations in education, London: Nesta. 

[23] Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 7, 95–105. 

[24] Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (1999). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2 (2–3), 87-105.

[25] Gess-Newsome, J. (2015). A model of teacher professional knowledge and skill including PCK: results of the thinking from the PCK summit. In A. Berry, P. J. Friedrichsen, & J. J. Loughran (Eds.), Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (pp. 28–42). New York, NY: Routledge.

[26] Getenet, S. T. (2020). Designing a professional development program for mathematics teachers for effective use of technology in teaching. Education and Information Technologies, 25, 1855–1873.

[27] Hamilton, E. R., Rosenberg, J. M., & Akcaoglu, M. (2016). The substitution augmentation modification redefinition (SAMR) model: A critical review and suggestions for its use. Tech Trends, 60 (5), 433-441.

[28] Hargreaves, A., Earl, L., Moore, S., & Manning, S. (2002). Learning to change: Teaching beyond subjects and standards. John Wiley & Sons. 

[29] Henriksen, D., Henderson, M., Creely E., Ceretkova, S., Černochová, M., Sendova, E., Sointu, E. T., & Tienken, C. H. (2018). Creativity and technology in education: An international perspective. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 23, 409–424.

[30] Holden, H., & Rada, R. (2011). Understanding the influence of perceived usability and technology self-efficacy on teachers’ technology acceptance. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(4), 343–367

[31] Jones, A., & Moreland, J. (2004). Enhancing practicing primary school teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge in technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 14(2), 121–140. doi:10.1023/B:ITDE.0000026513.48316.39.

[32] Kopcha, T. (2010). A systems-based approach to technology integration using mentoring and communities of practice. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(2), 175–190.

[33] Lawless, K. A., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2007). Professional development in integrating technology into teaching and learning: Knowns, unknowns, and ways to pursue better questions and answers. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 575–614.

[34] Levin, T., & Wadmany, R. (2005). Changes in educational beliefs and classroom practices of teachers and students in rich technology-based classrooms. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 14, 281–307.

[35] Lin, J. M. C., Wang, P. Y., & Lin, I. (2012). Pedagogy technology: A two-dimensional model for teachers’ ICT integration. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(1), 97–108.

[36] Matherson, L. H., Wilson, E. K., & Wright, V. H. (2014). Need TPACK? Embrace sustained professional development, Teaching performance, 45-52.

[37] McDougall, A., & Squires, D. (1997) A framework for reviewing teacher professional development programmes in information technology. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 6:2, 115-126, DOI: 10.1080/14759399700200008

[38] Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108 (6), 1017-1054.

[39] Mumtaz, S. (2000).  נ Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 9(3), 319-342. OECD policy responses to coronavirus (Covid-19) education responses to COVID-19: Embracing digital learning and online collaboration.(2020). Retrieved from OECD website. 

[40] Orland-Barak, L. & Wang, J. (2020).  Teacher Mentoring in Service of Preservice Teachers’ Learning to Teach: Conceptual Bases, Characteristics, and Challenges for Teacher Education Reform. Journal of Teacher Education. Forthcoming  

[41] Orland-Barak, L.& Yinon, H. (2005). Sometimes a novice and sometimes an expert: mentors’ professional expertise as revealed through their stories of critical incidents. Oxford Review of Education 31 (4), 557–578.

[42] Papert, S. (1993). The children's machine: Rethinking school in the age of the computer.New York, NY: BasicBooks.

[43] Reimers, F. M., & Schleicher, A. (2020). A framework to guide an education response to the COVID-19 Pandemic of 2020. Retrieved from OECD website

[44] Reyes, V. C., Reading C., Doyle, H., & Gregory, S. (2017). Integrating ICT into teacher education programs from a TPACK perspective: Exploring perceptions of university lecturers. Computers & Education, 115, 1-19.

[45] Rogers, C. R. (1983). Freedom to learn for the 80's. Columbus, Ohio: Charles E. Merrill Publishing Company.

[46] Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking. New York: Oxford University Press.

[47] Rogoff, B., Mistry, J., Göncü, A., & Mosier, C. (1993). Guided participation in cultural activity by toddlers and caregivers. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 58(8), (8), pages?  

[48] Romrell, D.  Kidder, L. & Wood, E. (2014) The SAMR Model as a Framework for Evaluating mLearning. Online Learning Journal, 18 (2), 2472-5730. Retrieved on July 23 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/183753/

[49] Rose, D. (2000). Universal design for learning. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15(3), 45-49.

[50] Sangani, H. R., & Stelma, J. (2012). Reflective practice in developing world contexts: a general review of literature and a specific consideration of an Iranian experience. Professional Development in Education, 38(1), 113-129. DOI: 10.1080/19415257.2011.587526

[51] Sherman, T., Sanders, M., & Kwon, H. (2010). Teaching in middle school technology education: A review of recent practices. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 20(4), 367–379. doi: 10.1007/s10798-009-9090-z.

[52] Smagorinsky, P., & Barnes, M. E. (2014). Revisiting and revis- ing the apprenticeship of observation. Teacher Education Quarterly, 41 (4), 29–52.

[53] Stanulis, R. N., & Brondyk, S. K. (2013). Complexities involved in mentoring toward a high-leverage practice in the induction years. Teachers College Record, 115, 1–34.

[54] Steenbergen-Hu, S. & Cooper H. (2013). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of Intelligent Tutoring Systems on K-12 students' mathematical learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105 (4), 970-987.

[55] Stein, S. J., Ginns, I. S., & McDonald, C. V. (2007). Teachers learning about technology and technology education: Insights from a professional development experience. International Journal of Technology & Design Education, 17, 179-195.

[56] Tondeur, J., Braak, J., Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2017). Understanding the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: A systematic review of qualitative evidence.Education Tech Research, 65, 555-575.

[57] Tondeur, J., Scherer, R., Baran, E., Siddiq, F., Valtonen T. & Sointu E. (2019). Teacher educators as gatekeepers: Preparing the next generation of teachers for technology integration in education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(3), 1189-1209.

[58] Van As, F. (2018). Communities of practice as a tool for continuing professional development of technology teachers’ professional knowledge. International Journal of Technology & Design Education, 28, 417–430.

[59] Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st century competences: Implications for national curriculum policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 299–321.

[60] Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. In R. S. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds.), Mind in society (pp. 79-91). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

[61] Waitoller, F. R., & King Thorius, K. A. (2016). Cross-pollinating culturally sustaining pedagogy and universal design for learning: Toward an inclusive pedagogy that accounts for disability. Harvard Educational Review, 86 (3), 366-389.

[62] Wermke, W. (2011). Continuing professional development in context: teachers' continuing professional development culture in Germany and Sweden. Professional Development in Education, 37:5, 665-683, DOI: 10.1080/19415257.2010.533573.